genus and differentia of computer

Put another way: That rule is only valuable because of our current limitations as humans, and I certainly don't think it can be said to apply in thise case. ; the differentia: The portion of the definition that is not provided by the genus. Phiwum (talk) 14:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC), NOTE: The SEP refers to Book V (Zeta) of Aristotle's metaphysics, not the Topics. a genus (or family): An existing definition that serves as a portion of the new definition; all definitions with the same genus are considered members of that genus. Genus–differentia definition — Part of a series on Aristotelianism … Wikipedia. Prima facie the article " Principia Mathematica" appears well laid out although there would probably be a great multitude of readers that do not need 400 pages to explain what was accepted before grade school. Let's say that I am the one who wrote that book; what in this situation has changed then? Again, includes criteria for evaluating such definitions. I don't think it's wrong to synthesize or even to produce original research on Wikipedia, because to me, the free‑flow of ideas and information is what is important—not whether some bloke said the same thing in some other medium. * a genus (or family): An existing definition that serves as a portion of the new definition; all definitions with the same genus are considered members of that genus. Perhaps my "immediate understanding" is just a lack of comprehensibility so maybe I should just go this route to see if there are minds more equipped to reach a more logical conclusion. Is a square a manifestation of a rectangle or is it a manifestation of a a rhombus? 17. Mfwitten (talk) 23:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC). Thus we have stated what virtue is in respect of its genus. As an example of what I mean I offer the definition of "Scotch Chess": It's chess, but after White's first move, each player makes several consecutive moves, namely one more than the number of moves made by the previous player. Layman, "The Power of Logic", 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, 2005. pp. For this I do not apologize as I have acquired some knowledge that rivals that of great minds. On the matter of citations, consider this: If a cited book states exactly what has been stated in this article, then you personally may remain just as confused and/or unswayed as you have been; what, then, does this book title do for you in this case that is so magical? Species Verb Genus Differentia A rifle is a dangerous object that shoots bullets. The five kinds of definition discussed are stipulative, lexical, precising, theoretical and persuasive. At this point, I've already exposed your example as being nonsensical with respect to your argument, but let's continue analyzing it. Concerning the above mentioned article "Jacobian matrix"; there are issues there also. To that, I think the very first footnote of WP:OR is instructive: Citations are not necessary if there is a reasonable expectation that every bit of material is supported by a published, reliable source. has come under attack for 2 reasons so far: Mfwitten (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC), You didn't actually answer my question: is there any good reason to prefer the example as it stands, despite the repeated need to defend yourself? It's actually ambiguous language, but I would say it basically means "a manifestation of": In terms of a definition by genus and differentia, when: then [a] Y is a genus of X, and it can simply be written: So, the example may be simplified further: As you can see, there is no non-genus portion of the differentia of this definition, so of course you cannot find a has‑a relationship. 101-102. See Species, Genus, and Differentia: "Since a definition defines an essence, only what has an essence can be defined.In general, however, it is not individuals but rather speciesthat have essences. You are correct in what I perceive is your implication that the example in question doesn't quite match linquistically with the other examples; I believe I changed the other examples and then didn't extend that change to the example in question. A method of defining terms would be the method used to determine the definition. What I wrote for the article is indeed a weaker statement than that against which you are arguing (and which does not exist in what I wrote), but that does not render it as having no value; in fact, the value comes from simply mentioning has‑a relationships along side is‑a relationships. Should we scrap or otherwise mangle the article on the Jacobian matrix just because you, as a particular reader, have trouble understanding it? Nieuw: Verwijzing gecorrigeerd naar het Van Dale On-linewoordenboek als Genus het woord niet kent. The purpose of "notability" is found in the fact that resources are finite; if Wikipedia had infinite resources, nobody would care if I made one new article for each of my bowel movements. In other words, that the genus is identical to the differentia. So, as you can see, all of the pieces fit nicely together. Why are you so adamant about destroying this useful information when you offer nothing to contribute in its place? So, which portion has been abstracted away? : an element, feature, or factor that distinguishes one entity, state, or class from another especially : a characteristic trait distinguishing a species from other species of the same genus. The Jacobian determinant has been confusingly referred to as "the Jacobian" so would this not be good information to be included an article? A rifle is a firearm with a long, narrow barrel. A species is defined by giving its genus and its differentia: the genus is the kind under which the species falls, and the differentia tells what characterizes the species within that genus. A rule-ignorer must justify how their actions improve the encyclopedia if challenged. 105-109. In further defense of the importance of the section on multiplicity, I secondly note that it directly leads to thinking about the structure of not only a set of definitions, but also the structure of a single definition, and how is‑a and has‑a relationships can be mapped to genera and differentiae (and, at least to some large degree, vice versa). Since there is only one source, and nothing pertinent to the rest of the article, it is somewhat difficult to follow non-existent references to check facts. See more. 2 Secondly, I address the accusations of WP:OR. Regarding references: I personally feel that references are only useful for resolving disputes. At times and in sundry places I have made light of my ignorance. How to use differentia in a sentence. Articles can survive as long as the are uncontested. In history of logic: Johann Heinrich Lambert. Clearly, the article was superior before your edit. Example sentences with the word differentia. However, this almost always does not make sense: That rule only makes sense when resources are limited, such as when an article has become very lengthy, and it becomes worthwhile to reorganize or streamline it, etc. "Jacobian matrix" and Hessian matrix mention partial derivatives but "Jacobian matrix" states, "... is the matrix of all first-order partial derivatives of a vector- or scalar-valued function...", while "Hessian matrix" states, "...is the square matrix of second-order partial derivatives. Phiwum (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC). I think that this book may be more relevant for us, since it seems to deal more explicitly with differentia. Start studying 6 Rules for defining terms by genus and difference. I don't mean to kick Mfwitten while he's down, and I know that he's the reason we've lost the old intro and the table presentation of definitions, but it seems to me that these losses were a mistake. Regarding a History section: I don't particularly care about the history, personally—I don't particularly care that someone thinks that we would be deprived of this concept (or at least this terminology) unless some guy named Boethius wrote about it. ", and I now object, so would you mind choosing a better example? Aristotle’s logic, especially his theory of the syllogism, has had an unparalleled influence on the history of Western thought. I have read that there are limits of defining certain things by genus and difference. But this is only a fundamental Wikipedia criteria that to some is obviously not important. That might be true to some, but in reality may only be on a particular point or subject, thus one may still be learned and lack certain knowledge. Any opinions? If so, then your approach to editing Wikipedia is unthinking and at a greater risk of being harmful (in fact, it has just been harmful). what this Wikipedia article used initially. One feature that best reflects the perceptions of scholars who use logic as a scientific tool is A large number of the readers of Wikipedia are no doubt people who are familiar with object‑oriented programming, a subject in which is‑a, has‑a, derivation (differentiation, extension, etc. From my own shelves, I've found the following references. The fact that a real and current user name is the subject, that also happens to be a major contributor, raises issues of conflict of interest. Reason Papers (Issue 21): Review Essay: Tara Smith, The pragmatics of defining religion: contexts, concepts, and contests, Aristotle: critical assessments, Volume 2, What Art Is: The Esthetic Theory of Ayn Rand, The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy, Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf, WP:NOTABILITY#Why we have these requirements, indiscriminate collections of information, 19:51, 11 February 2011 Mfwitten (revert). Search. In further defense of the importance of the section on multiplicity, I firstly note that I am a reader who would be deeply troubled by the presence of multiple definitions for a single term, and having this kind of guiding text to focus my thinking would save me a lot of strife, personally; the presence of this text is something that you as a reader may shrug off as a triviality, but for me as a reader, it would save a great deal of mental anguish. © 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc. Copi and Cohen's "Introduction to Logic", Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009, pp. "The world changes, and Wikipedia must change with it. This, combined with the spirit of acceptable synthesis makes what I have written acceptable, and WP:IGNORE makes what I have written essential. 2)- User name (supposedly fictitious); You have stated that I am indignant and have an aversion over your use of a presented "fictitious" name when the. differentia definition is - an element, feature, or factor that distinguishes one entity, state, or class from another; especially : a characteristic trait distinguishing a species from other species of the same genus. (Grammatically, there is a slight difference not mentioned by Copi, namely that a genus is a class, while a difference is a predicate, but this is trivially fixed by saying the genus is "rational thing" and the difference "is an animal".). For instance, let's assume that this article does perform a synthesis that cannot be attributed to some non‑Wikipedia source. + "Partial derivative" explains, "The difference between the total and partial derivative is the elimination of indirect dependencies between variables in partial derivatives. Copi's "Introduction to Logic", The Macmillan Company, 1961, pp. By substituting the definition of a rectangle into the definition of a square, one gets: Just as "piety" in your example is (likely) a genus of "justice" (and certainly not the other way around), so it is that "a rectangle" is a genus of "a square" (and certainly not the other way around); a square is a manifestation of a rectangle; a square is a rectangle. Passion refers to the desire, envy, anger, fear, confidence, happy, friendly feeling, hatred, desire, envy, compassion, which is feelings associated with pleasure or pain generally. How to use differentia in a sentence. ? This process of producing new definitions by extending existing definitions is commonly known as differentiation (and also as derivation). Includes rules for writing a good definition. So, the non‑genus portion of the differentia of the definition of "a sequence" that you provided does express new has‑a relationships: As an aside, even a genus provides the means by which to express a has‑a relationship; after all, just expressing that a sequence is a tree is enough to express that a sequence has one or more nodes, for instance. 1 In the context of the subject would this then not be a genus–differencia method? Surely you do not argue with this? While I've already made my point, I'll entertain the example you provided, which is: Let's do some abstraction to make the example clearer: So, the non-genus portion of the differentia of the definition of "a sequence" that you provided does indeed provide a means by which to express a has‑a relationship, namely: Similarly, the definition you provided expresses a constraint on an existing has‑a relationship: The constraint is that each node be a SequenceNode. Your example is interesting (as I hope you'll see), but it does not help your case (in fact, it helps mine). 101-106. Genus: Law Differentia: Although specified at a particular time, applies to a time period before that Comment: A retroactive law nullifies the objectivity of the law, which is the purpose of having laws. I don't know where that occurs offhand. A definition consists of a genus and a species. For reference, here's the example: Now, I imagine that the term Piety is being defined, so let's place it in a more canonical form: What does "pertaining to" mean? Species of the…, Genetic variability and structure of nonindigenous vs native populations are compared for the Eurasian round goby Neogobius…, New Caledonia is well known as a hot spot of biodiversity whose origin as a land mass can be traced back to the Gondwanan…, Staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) and elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata), are important reef builders in the Caribbean. Some features of the site may not work correctly. Of course, it's a task worth considering. Discussing accidents of our particular Universe, like Boethius. The abstraction made is "chess, except that the order in which the order of play remains unspecified", followed by differentiation by specifying an order of play that is different to that of chess. The only thing going for the detractors of what I have written is the lack of citations. 2. 0 Didlogos, 66 0995) pp. I don't think it is just me, and the fact it may be above my "immediate understanding", that this is confusing. 3)- References; There is notability for content and this is being discussed in the section below as some of the many references surely can be used. You are currently offline. A genus may be on a lower or a higher level of abstraction. Otr500 (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2011 (UTC). This is because knowledge is not a kind of animal, nor are animals a kind of knowledge. Aristotelian equation: Definition of term = genus + differentia. Look at how I've used what was talked about in the article (before you destroyed it) to help you understand your own example in great depth. A genus–differentia definition is a type of intensional definition, and it is composed of two parts: 1. 1 A distinguishing mark or characteristic. The superior fiber properties of Gossypium barbadense L. serve as a source of novel variation for improving fiber quality in…, A close relationship between K3 surfaces and the Mathieu groups has been established in the last century. it relates these more formal definitions of 'individual' and 'identity' to the more common notions without relying on non-Wikipedia culture. I was just wondering if this method of definition includes those which start by (perhaps implicitly) abstracting from an existing definition to create a genus, and then becoming more specific again with different differentia - or if there is a different term for such a process. Passion is a kind of emotion, emotion is a “genus” of passion. This page was last edited on 30 September 2013, at 20:52. Discussing inherent, fundamental, unchanging concepts (of a, say, To mirror the pattern of the other definitions, which are introduced with an indefinite article. The common purpose of building a free encyclopedia trumps both. A history section is very important to the article and inclusion for some connection to Aristotelianism other than one reference. You are arguing against a statement that is not there, and thus ALL of your examples are wasted. In light of that, as with entertaining the thought of sections, it might be a good idea to consider the genus–differentia of the evidence presented. Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic. Omits both the discussion of "rational animal" and the claim that the choice of genus and difference is arbitrary (in the sense mentioned above, that we could take the difference as the genus and vice versa). Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Genus–differentia_definition&oldid=575194471, Start-Class philosophy of language articles, Philosophy of language task force articles, Automatically assessed Linguistics articles, Low-importance philosophy of language articles, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This article has not yet received a rating on the project's, An embedded account name appears like vandalism. Which definition is correct? These are four of the first six books I grabbed off of my shelf. What makes various kinds of animals different from each other and what makes various kinds of knowledge different are different. The only two which do not discuss genus-difference are Baronet's Logic and Washburn's The Vocabulary of Critical Thinking (which is not so focused on logic per se). But the genus on a univocal theory contains differentiae that are contrary to one another. A non‑genus portion of the differentia of "justice". The genera (class and sect) are relative synonyms of 'group'. (See also. 1 Mfwitten (talk) 16:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC), These policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles. Thank you for the sectioning. Second, I really like the tables that break down the examples clearly into genus and difference — and make no special consideration for the cases in which the difference involves membership in a genus. it hints at the thoughtful use of definite and indefinite articles used throughout the development of the concept of definition by genus and differentia (and it is also an allusion to those human languages in which it is permissible to use the definite article before somebody's name); the definition itself also follows the explicit 'a with ' pattern that has been frequently used. And differentia of passion is a feeling Information should be destroyed when it is, We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a, We require that all articles rely primarily on, We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with, Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply to all articles, not solely articles justified under the, The spirit of the rule trumps the letter of the rule. Ultimately, there is no, say, "journal" that is more peer‑reviewed than Wikipedia. It is the difference that is problematic. Look at all of this careful thought that is at the basis of what has been written. What is wrong with this definition? "Do you feel this page has sufficient citations and that those citations come from. This was not addressed in replying comments nor in edits. Now, I recognize that this stance is diametrically opposed to the stance that some users of Wikipedia have. Your thoughts are incomplete. 1)-The title name; This is being discussed in the section below. Character is the combination of qualities which make a particular person, thing, … But, they can be put into a hierarchy (class > sect). Because they complement each other, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another. However, often morphisms refer to relationships between objects, and mathematicians often consider these relationships to be more important than the objects themselves (I guess reflecting a structuralist point of view?) We might consider the objects of a category to be a "genus", and then single out certain types of these objects through differentia. The discussion that we are having is part of your argument; your argument for a destructive edit is based (at least partially) on it. A genus–differentia definition is a type of intensional definition, and it is composed of two parts:. A genus–differentia definition is a type of intensional definition, and it is composed of two parts: 1. The non-genus portion of the differentia of a definition provides a means by which to specify a has‑a relationship... A sequence has one or more SequenceNodes. With regard to abstraction, first take a look at the discussion on abstraction. The entire connotation of the term is given by stating the genus and the differentia of the term. I would also like to state that I will have no qualms bringing. noun differentiae. For every reader of an encyclopedia, there is at least some material that is beyond that reader's immediate understanding; this simply means that the reader does not yet have a mature enough foundation for the subject. The differentia (rules and superiority) or (superior and rules) are free for multiple uses: 'a ruling class', 'rules superiority', or 'transcends its sect' so as to avoid circularity. "Genus and Differentia" might be an option depending on references. To determine if a subject (a lucky guess notwithstanding) does not have a "mature enough foundation" for understanding or is simply having trouble understanding, possibly because the way something is presented, is certainly debatable. Since "ignorance", which can be defined by genus and differentia, is only a lack of knowledge, I imagine all are ignorant to some point. You are not improving Wikipedia by destroying content like this. ; For example, consider these two definitions: It was used and consensus by silence has allowed it to remain. That is, "That part of justice" is an abstraction; it is something that has been abstracted away from the definition of "justice" (fortunately, you haven't yet destroyed the part of the article that expounds upon abstraction). Climate flickers and range shifts of reef corals, Sphagnum—A Keystone Genus in Habitat Restoration, Crossopterygian fishes from the Devonian of Antarctica: systematics, relationships and biogeographic significance, Normapolles pollen from the Mississippi embayment. In the…, We present a new remeshing scheme based on the idea of improving mesh quality by a series of local modifications of the mesh…, Four new genera of osteolepifonns and a new rhizodontifonn genus are described from the Middle-Late Devonian Aztec Siltstone…, ___________________ Introduction _________________ Previous reports, North American __ Taxonomic reports ________ Nontaxonomic…, By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our, Linkage Map Construction and Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Agronomic and Fiber Quality Traits in Cotton, K3 Surfaces, N=4 Dyons, and the Mathieu Group M24, A catalog of the Tenuipalpidae (Acari) of the World with a key to genera, Invasion Genetics of Ponto-Caspian Gobies in the Great Lakes: A ‘Cryptic’ Species, Absence of Founder Effects, and Comparative Risk Analysis. This article has been around since 2001. Perhaps you don't, but your reasons for removing this particular example are absurd, especially in the face of such richness. Aristotle offers a dilemma. (Be sure also to look at my questions regarding WP:OR at the bottom of this talk page, please.) {\displaystyle 1+1=2} I would imagine there could be found some that could present some form of argument though. Synonyms Example Sentences Learn More about differentia. We should probably also refer to Aristotle's treatment of such definitions. Also includes rules for writing a good definition by genus-difference. * the differentia: The portion of the definition that is not provided by the genus. Phiwum (talk) 14:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC). The genus for your definition can be simply "quality", or more precisely, "moral principle". Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy#Aristotle on Genus/Difference? The positions that you are representing are, in my opinion, unhelpful to Wikipedia. It is highly probable that no one person (specifically speaking of the species Homo sapiens) knows everything. The common definition given for "justice" is circular: "the quality of being just" "Just" is defined in your average dictionary as: - "free from favoritism or self-interest or bias or deception" (negative definition) He targets Plato’s view that where one form is a constituent in another, as in the construction of a species-form out of genus- and differentia-forms, all are equally separate substances, so that a substance has actual substances as its parts. Mfwitten (talk) 03:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC). I assume that since words can be subjected to this method then certainly sentences and even paragraphs can. For the record, I am not the one who chose the current title of the article, and I'm currently the, The whole definition (to which one may refer with the term "Mfwitten" or "the Mfitten") is, The genus of Mfwitten (which is "a Wikipedia user") may be called synonymously, The differentia of Mfwitten (which is "with the account name 'Mfwitten'") may be called synonymously. I can show another side of my foundational maturity regarding references should the need arise. Second, the specific difference must be named— the attribute that distinguishes the members of that species from members of all others species in that genus. Mfwitten (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2011 (UTC), I am listing comments on the project page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy. What are you going to do with that synthesis? Definition by abstraction then speciation? Now, what about its relationship to "justice"? However, my understanding of "justice" suggests that "piety" is in fact employed as a genus of justice: When justice is served, the gods are served; justice is a manifestation of piety; justice is piety.

Lehrplan Verwaltungsfachangestellte Baden-württemberg, Marshall Box Saturn, Handball Weltrangliste Nationalmannschaft, Xylocain Spray Wofür, Burberry Parfum Damen Her, Definisi Dan Klasifikasi Logika,